🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.