🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing number of nations are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," commented the MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to disturbing online content argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, action is mostly happening at the state government level due to national gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to mimic the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "could backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this global discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.